The influence of Thomas Jefferson on the founding of America is somewhat overrated. No one would deny the strength of Jefferson's intellect, and the fact that he had influence both on national and Virginia politics during the founding era. Secular Humanists and Christians alike love to quote Jefferson because both can find material in Jefferson that affirms their worldview. Jefferson's influence did extend to American institutions, but the scope of his influence is overplayed in the excessive use of Jefferson in modern literature.
First consider that Thomas Jefferson was not even in America during the Constitutional Convention. He was the ambassador to France at that time. Secondly, most of you were probably taught that he wrote the Declaration of Independence, but the truth is that he was one of a committee of five able men who were assigned to draft the Declaration of Independence. John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston teamed up with Jefferson to draft a document which was eventually presented to Congress. After the drafting committee presented the Declaration of Independence to Congress at least 85 changes were made to the document including the removal of almost 500 words. The myth that Thomas Jefferson was the sole author of the declaration of Independence was first introduced during his presidential campaigns against John Adams. Finally, consider his inability to overcome his greatest opponents. His loss to John Adams, a strong Christian, for president is well known. He also singled out Fisher Ames for defeat in 1792 because he uncompromisingly influenced the civil institutions of the United States with Biblical principles. Fisher Ames was reelected that year receiving 1,627 out of 2,900 votes.
Why do Secular Humanists like Jefferson so much? He was undoubtedly influenced by enlightenment thinking while in France. He was most probably not a Christian, as is evidenced by his version of the Bible. He cut out all miracles until he was only left with a bare shell of scripture. He, along with humanists, believed that human reason could solve all problems. Finally, they love to distort the meaning of the phrase “separation of church and state,” which he coined in a letter to the Danbury Baptists while president.
Why do Christians like to appeal to Jefferson? He was superintendent of the Washington D.C. Schools while President of the United States, and as an official act in that capacity he required two text books be used in the school: the Bible and Watt's Hymnal. His references to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God,” “self-evident” truths,” “endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” “all men are created equal,” “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and the grievances against the king, are all concepts distinctive to Christian thinking in respect to civil government.
Besides the fact that the Declaration of Independence is a work of a body of founders who ordered their lives by Christian doctrines, in 1825 Jefferson explained why the Declaration of Independence was formed as a Christian document. The overwhelming mindset of the American people in 1776 was Christian. America was still under the influence of the Great Awakening, and Alexis DeTocqueville confirms that even 50 years later “Christianity reigns”. Consider this statement from his Democracy in America, “Among the Anglo-Americans there are some who profess Christian dogmas because they believe them and others who do so because they are afraid to look as though they did not believe in them. So Christianity reigns without obstacles, by universal consent; consequently, as I have said elsewhere, everything in the moral field is certain and fixed...” Jefferson said, “Neither aiming at originality of principles, or sentiments, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind. We wanted not only to communicate in words and ideas that were popular in Europe, we wanted the Declaration of Independence to be reflective of the way Americans thought.”
Randy Pope is the founder of www.modestclothingdistributors.com. He served on City Council in a small town in Ohio and ran for School Board, City Treasurer and State Representative. Randy has a burden to bring a Christian worldview to the market place of ideas. You can read more at www.christianworldviewofhistoryandculture.com.
Showing posts with label Secular Humanist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secular Humanist. Show all posts
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Thomas Jefferson was not the sole author of the Declaration of Independence
The influence of Thomas Jefferson on the founding of America is somewhat overrated. No one would deny the strength of Jefferson's intellect, and the fact that he had influence both on national and Virginia politics during the founding era. Secular Humanists and Christians alike love to quote Jefferson because both can find material in Jefferson that affirms their worldview. Jefferson's influence did extend to American institutions, but the scope of his influence is overplayed in the excessive use of Jefferson in modern literature.
First consider that Thomas Jefferson was not even in America during the Constitutional Convention. He was the ambassador to France at that time. Secondly, most of you were probably taught that he wrote the Declaration of Independence, but the truth is that he was one of a committee of five able men who were assigned to draft the Declaration of Independence. John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston teamed up with Jefferson to draft a document which was eventually presented to Congress. After the drafting committee presented the Declaration of Independence to Congress at least 85 changes were made to the document including the removal of almost 500 words. The myth that Thomas Jefferson was the sole author of the declaration of Independence was first introduced during his presidential campaigns against John Adams. Finally, consider his inability to overcome his greatest opponents. His loss to John Adams, a strong Christian, for president is well known. He also singled out Fisher Ames for defeat in 1792 because he uncompromisingly influenced the civil institutions of the United States with Biblical principles. Fisher Ames was reelected that year receiving 1,627 out of 2,900 votes.
Why do Secular Humanists like Jefferson so much? He was undoubtedly influenced by enlightenment thinking while in France. He was most probably not a Christian, as is evidenced by his version of the Bible. He cut out all miracles until he was only left with a bare shell of scripture. He, along with humanists, believed that human reason could solve all problems. Finally, they love to distort the meaning of the phrase “separation of church and state,” which he coined in a letter to the Danbury Baptists while president.
Why do Christians like to appeal to Jefferson? He was superintendent of the Washington D.C. Schools while President of the United States, and as an official act in that capacity he required two text books be used in the school: the Bible and Watt's Hymnal. His references to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God,” “self-evident” truths,” “endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” “all men are created equal,” “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and the grievances against the king, are all concepts distinctive to Christian thinking in respect to civil government.
Besides the fact that the Declaration of Independence is a work of a body of founders who ordered their lives by Christian doctrines, in 1825 Jefferson explained why the Declaration of Independence was formed as a Christian document. The overwhelming mindset of the American people in 1776 was Christian. America was still under the influence of the Great Awakening, and Alexis DeTocqueville confirms that even 50 years later “Christianity reigns”. Consider this statement from his Democracy in America, “Among the Anglo-Americans there are some who profess Christian dogmas because they believe them and others who do so because they are afraid to look as though they did not believe in them. So Christianity reigns without obstacles, by universal consent; consequently, as I have said elsewhere, everything in the moral field is certain and fixed...” Jefferson said, “Neither aiming at originality of principles, or sentiments, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind. We wanted not only to communicate in words and ideas that were popular in Europe, we wanted the Declaration of Independence to be reflective of the way Americans thought.”
First consider that Thomas Jefferson was not even in America during the Constitutional Convention. He was the ambassador to France at that time. Secondly, most of you were probably taught that he wrote the Declaration of Independence, but the truth is that he was one of a committee of five able men who were assigned to draft the Declaration of Independence. John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston teamed up with Jefferson to draft a document which was eventually presented to Congress. After the drafting committee presented the Declaration of Independence to Congress at least 85 changes were made to the document including the removal of almost 500 words. The myth that Thomas Jefferson was the sole author of the declaration of Independence was first introduced during his presidential campaigns against John Adams. Finally, consider his inability to overcome his greatest opponents. His loss to John Adams, a strong Christian, for president is well known. He also singled out Fisher Ames for defeat in 1792 because he uncompromisingly influenced the civil institutions of the United States with Biblical principles. Fisher Ames was reelected that year receiving 1,627 out of 2,900 votes.
Why do Secular Humanists like Jefferson so much? He was undoubtedly influenced by enlightenment thinking while in France. He was most probably not a Christian, as is evidenced by his version of the Bible. He cut out all miracles until he was only left with a bare shell of scripture. He, along with humanists, believed that human reason could solve all problems. Finally, they love to distort the meaning of the phrase “separation of church and state,” which he coined in a letter to the Danbury Baptists while president.
Why do Christians like to appeal to Jefferson? He was superintendent of the Washington D.C. Schools while President of the United States, and as an official act in that capacity he required two text books be used in the school: the Bible and Watt's Hymnal. His references to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God,” “self-evident” truths,” “endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” “all men are created equal,” “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” and the grievances against the king, are all concepts distinctive to Christian thinking in respect to civil government.
Besides the fact that the Declaration of Independence is a work of a body of founders who ordered their lives by Christian doctrines, in 1825 Jefferson explained why the Declaration of Independence was formed as a Christian document. The overwhelming mindset of the American people in 1776 was Christian. America was still under the influence of the Great Awakening, and Alexis DeTocqueville confirms that even 50 years later “Christianity reigns”. Consider this statement from his Democracy in America, “Among the Anglo-Americans there are some who profess Christian dogmas because they believe them and others who do so because they are afraid to look as though they did not believe in them. So Christianity reigns without obstacles, by universal consent; consequently, as I have said elsewhere, everything in the moral field is certain and fixed...” Jefferson said, “Neither aiming at originality of principles, or sentiments, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind. We wanted not only to communicate in words and ideas that were popular in Europe, we wanted the Declaration of Independence to be reflective of the way Americans thought.”
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Davey Crockett Constitutional Congressman After Returning to Congress Upon Meeting Horatio Bunce
You may know of the political conversion of Davey Crockett by the dedicated Christian Horatio Bunce (if you do not you can read the first two installments in this series by clicking on the links below this story). The Congressman Davey Crockett learned the value of government based on law, the Constitution, over governing by the dictates of sentimentalism from the enlightened backwoods farmer, Horatio Bunce. In his book, The Life of Colonel David Crockett, Edward S. Ellis relates “the rest of the story”.
Davey Crockett was reelected to Congress. It was not long before he was faced with a vote similar to the “Georgetown vote”. A bill had been introduced to give $10,000 to the widow of a naval officer that had recently passed away. Crockett took to the floor against the bill proclaiming that, “Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity.” Claiming that, “Every member upon this floor knows it.” And reminding the members that, “We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money...” He finished by proclaiming his intention to give one week's pay to the widow, and challenging the rest of the members to, “do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks.”
Even after waxing eloquent about the debt of gratitude that the nation owed this honored veteran, not one other Congressman accepted Davey Crockett's challenge to give a week's pay to the widow. He excoriated them, saying, “Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it.”
The founding fathers attempted to break free from the Religious Humanist policy of the
lordship of government. From the very beginning of the republic you see the tendency to look to this “great lord” to be the “great provider”. In 21st century America the state has grown to “behemoth” proportions. Even most Christians call on this man made god to provide their needs, and desires. It is not a surprise that this blatant idolatry would capture the minds of a Secular Humanist culture, but it is a mystery as to how the church has turned to government rather than God as their provider.
All is not lost though. The Christian can still repent of the sin of idolatry. A reformation of the church will defeat the march of the tyrants. Tyranny cannot stand when the church exerts its authority over all of culture. The Christian must turn to God, learn his Constitution, stop depending on government to provide his every need, and take up his responsibility to care for the “widow and orphan.”
Davey Crockett was reelected to Congress. It was not long before he was faced with a vote similar to the “Georgetown vote”. A bill had been introduced to give $10,000 to the widow of a naval officer that had recently passed away. Crockett took to the floor against the bill proclaiming that, “Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity.” Claiming that, “Every member upon this floor knows it.” And reminding the members that, “We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money...” He finished by proclaiming his intention to give one week's pay to the widow, and challenging the rest of the members to, “do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks.”
Even after waxing eloquent about the debt of gratitude that the nation owed this honored veteran, not one other Congressman accepted Davey Crockett's challenge to give a week's pay to the widow. He excoriated them, saying, “Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it.”
The founding fathers attempted to break free from the Religious Humanist policy of the
lordship of government. From the very beginning of the republic you see the tendency to look to this “great lord” to be the “great provider”. In 21st century America the state has grown to “behemoth” proportions. Even most Christians call on this man made god to provide their needs, and desires. It is not a surprise that this blatant idolatry would capture the minds of a Secular Humanist culture, but it is a mystery as to how the church has turned to government rather than God as their provider.
All is not lost though. The Christian can still repent of the sin of idolatry. A reformation of the church will defeat the march of the tyrants. Tyranny cannot stand when the church exerts its authority over all of culture. The Christian must turn to God, learn his Constitution, stop depending on government to provide his every need, and take up his responsibility to care for the “widow and orphan.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)